Xeon E3-1225
VS
Core i3-7101TE

Xeon E3-1225 vs Core i3-7101TE

Intel

Xeon E3-1225

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-7101TE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1225 is positioned at rank 654 and the Core i3-7101TE is on rank 552, so the Core i3-7101TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1225

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
11930%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2253%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2001%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1546%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
100%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
98%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
98%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
97%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
97%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
97%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
97%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
97%
#654
Xeon E3-1225
MSRP: $224|Avg: $205
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9220%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8712%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6325%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1906%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1509%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1320%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
756%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
746%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
680%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
680%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
672%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
654%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
645%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
642%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
636%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
97%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
98%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
97%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
96%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
100%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
100%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
98%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
97%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
97%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
97%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
96%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7101TE (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E3-1225Core i3-7101TE
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($205)
More affordable ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1225 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E3-1225Core i3-7101TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+246%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($205)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1225 and Core i3-7101TE

Intel

Xeon E3-1225

The Xeon E3-1225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,903 points. Launch price was $150.

Intel

Core i3-7101TE

The Core i3-7101TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,956 points. Launch price was $117.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1225 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7101TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E3-1225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7101TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1225 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7101TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1225 scores 3,903 against the Core i3-7101TE's 3,956 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i3-7101TE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101TE.

FeatureXeon E3-1225Core i3-7101TE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,903
3,956+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,188
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,368
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1225 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7101TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1225Core i3-7101TE
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1225) / Yes (Core i3-7101TE). The Core i3-7101TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1225 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon E3-1225Core i3-7101TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E3-1225 launched at $224 MSRP, while the Core i3-7101TE debuted at $117. At current prices ($205 vs $60), the Core i3-7101TE is $145 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1225 delivers 19.0 pts/$ vs 65.9 pts/$ for the Core i3-7101TE — making the Core i3-7101TE the 110.4% better value option.

FeatureXeon E3-1225Core i3-7101TE
MSRP
$224
$117-48%
Avg Price (30d)
$205
$60-71%
Performance per Dollar
19.0
65.9+247%
Release Date
2011
2017