Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon X5675
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon X5675
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is positioned at rank 547 and the Xeon X5675 is on rank 998, so the Xeon E3-1240 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240 v2
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($22) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+585%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($22) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Xeon X5675
Xeon E3-1240 v2
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $304.
Xeon X5675
The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5675 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v2 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 — a 9.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 v2 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5675 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 scores 6,385 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5675. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+10% | 3.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+11% | 3.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12288 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,385 | 6,418 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Xeon X5675 debuted at $1440. At current prices ($150 vs $22), the Xeon X5675 is $128 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1240 v2 delivers 42.6 pts/$ vs 291.7 pts/$ for the Xeon X5675 — making the Xeon X5675 the 149.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v2 | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-83% | $1440 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $22-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.6 | 291.7+585% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Xeon X5675
