Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E7330

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E7330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E7330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1240 v2

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 69W instead of 80W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,385 vs 6,491).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 101.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Xeon E7330

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $186 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 297.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 101.4 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌15.9% higher power demand at 80W vs 69W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1240 v2 better than Xeon E7330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1240 v2 is ahead with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7330 pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Xeon E3-1240 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1240 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7330 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E3-1240 v2 comes in 290.6% more expensive on MSRP at $250 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7330 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.7% better PassMark. Xeon E7330 is also 297.1% better value on MSRP (101.4 vs 25.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1240 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2007) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Xeon E7330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1240 v2

The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $304.

Xeon E7330

The Xeon E7330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,491 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 scores 6,385 against the Xeon E7330's 6,491 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E7330. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7330.

Feature	Xeon E3-1240 v2	Xeon E7330
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	6,385	6,491+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1240 v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7330 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1240 v2	Xeon E7330
Socket	LGA1155	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 was priced at $250, while the Xeon E7330 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($250 vs $64), Xeon E7330 was $186 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1240 v2 delivers 25.5 pts/$ vs 101.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7330 — making the Xeon E7330 the 119.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E3-1240 v2	Xeon E7330
MSRP	$250	$64-74%
Performance per Dollar	25.5	101.4+298%
Release Date	2012	2007

Search Xeon E3-1240 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon E7330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.