Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E3-1240 v2
Core i7-10510U
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-10510U is positioned at rank 963 and the Xeon E3-1240 v2 is on rank 547, so the Xeon E3-1240 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-10510U
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-10510U | Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($409) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-10510U | Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+172%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($409) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10510U and Xeon E3-1240 v2
Core i7-10510U
The Core i7-10510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,408 points. Launch price was $409.
Xeon E3-1240 v2
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $304.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-10510U and Xeon E3-1240 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10510U versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v2 — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-10510U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10510U scores 6,408 against the Xeon E3-1240 v2's 6,385 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-10510U. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+29% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+89% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,408 | 6,385 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,866 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10510U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510U) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v2). The Core i7-10510U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E3-1240 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10510U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-10510U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-10510U launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1240 v2 debuted at $250.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $250-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-10510U and Xeon E3-1240 v2
