Core i7-10510U vs Xeon X5675
Core i7-10510U
Xeon X5675
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-10510U is positioned at rank 963 and the Xeon X5675 is on rank 998, so the Core i7-10510U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-10510U
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5675
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-10510U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($409) | ✅ More affordable ($22) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-10510U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1762%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($409) | ✅ More affordable ($22) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10510U and Xeon X5675
Core i7-10510U
The Core i7-10510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,408 points. Launch price was $409.
Xeon X5675
The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10510U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5675 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5675 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10510U versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5675 — a 34.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i7-10510U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5675 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10510U scores 6,408 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5675. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10510U vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+42% | 3.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.06 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12288 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,408 | 6,418 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,866 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10510U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-10510U versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5675 — the Core i7-10510U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-10510U) vs 3 (Xeon X5675). Chipset compatibility: 400-series (Core i7-10510U) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5675).
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510U) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). The Core i7-10510U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon X5675 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10510U targets Productivity, Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10510U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U; Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Productivity | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-10510U launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon X5675 debuted at $1440.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-72% | $1440 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $22 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-10510U and Xeon X5675
