
Core i7-10510U

FX-9370
Core i7-10510U vs FX-9370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10510U vs FX-9370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10510U vs FX-9370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10510U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while FX-9370 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 151.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
FX-9370
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $367 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 868.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 151.8 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,374 vs 6,408).
- ❌1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10510U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10510U better than FX-9370?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10510U vs FX-9370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10510U
The Core i7-10510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,408 points. Launch price was $409.

FX-9370
The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10510U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-9370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10510U versus 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i7-10510U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-9370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10510U scores 6,408 against the FX-9370's 6,374 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-10510U.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+144% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,408 | 6,374 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,866 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10510U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510U) / not specified (FX-9370). The Core i7-10510U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the FX-9370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10510U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-10510U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-10510U was priced at $409, while the FX-9370 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($409 vs $42), FX-9370 was $367 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10510U delivers 15.7 pts/$ vs 151.8 pts/$ for the FX-9370 — making the FX-9370 the 162.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10510U | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $42-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.7 | 151.8+867% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















