
Xeon E3-1240 v6 vs Core i7-1160G7

Xeon E3-1240 v6

Core i7-1160G7
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1240 v6 is positioned at rank 494 and the Core i7-1160G7 is on rank 867, so the Xeon E3-1240 v6 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240 v6
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-1160G7
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1240 v6 | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1240 v6 | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-1160G7

Xeon E3-1240 v6
The Xeon E3-1240 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,731 points. Launch price was $272.

Core i7-1160G7
The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1240 v6 and Core i7-1160G7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v6 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240 v6 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1160G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 v6 scores 8,731 against the Core i7-1160G7's 8,720 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v6. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1240 v6 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v6 | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+208% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 8,731 | 8,720 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,758 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1240 v6 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1160G7 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v6 | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1598 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v6) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7). The Core i7-1160G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E3-1240 v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1240 v6 | Core i7-1160G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Premium Ultrabook/Tablet |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















