Xeon E3-1240L v5
VS
FX-8120

Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs FX-8120

Intel

Xeon E3-1240L v5

4 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015
VS
AMD

FX-8120

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is positioned at rank 440 and the FX-8120 is on rank 567, so the Xeon E3-1240L v5 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240L v5

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
6348%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1199%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1065%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
823%
#285
Xeon w5-3535X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: N/A
100%
#286
Xeon w5-2465X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1499
99%
#287
EPYC 9355P
MSRP: $2998|Avg: $3026
99%
#288
Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $1600
99%
#289
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
MSRP: $2899|Avg: $2699.99
99%
#440
Xeon E3-1240L v5
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#451
Xeon D-1718T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $302
98%
#452
Xeon D-1622
MSRP: $195|Avg: $170
97%
#453
Xeon E3-1290 v2
MSRP: $885|Avg: $125
97%
#454
Xeon E5-2420 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $112
97%
#455
Xeon E3-1285 v6
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8120

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9690%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9156%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6648%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2003%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1586%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1388%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
795%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
784%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
714%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
714%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
706%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
687%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
678%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
675%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
669%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
100%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
100%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
100%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
99%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
98%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
98%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1240L v5FX-8120
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-DT (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8120 ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($40 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1240L v5FX-8120
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1240L v5 and FX-8120

Intel

Xeon E3-1240L v5

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,547 points. Launch price was $278.

AMD

FX-8120

The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8120 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240L v5 versus 4 GHz on the FX-8120 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the FX-8120 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8120 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240L v5 scores 6,547 against the FX-8120's 6,594 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-8120. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs 8192 kB on the FX-8120.

FeatureXeon E3-1240L v5FX-8120
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz+48%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8192 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-DT (2015)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
6,547
6,594
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1240L v5FX-8120
Socket
LGA1151
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0