Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs Xeon Silver 4112

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs Xeon Silver 4112 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs Xeon Silver 4112: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1240L v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4112 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Silver 4112

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,536 vs 6,547).
❌Launch MSRP is still $885 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240L v5 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4112 better than Xeon E3-1240L v5?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4112 is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240L v5 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240L v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4112 is the better buy right now. Xeon Silver 4112 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $885 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1240L v5 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4112 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs Xeon Silver 4112 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1240L v5

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,547 points. Launch price was $278.

Xeon Silver 4112

The Xeon Silver 4112 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,536 points. Launch price was $473.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Xeon Silver 4112 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240L v5 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4112 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240L v5 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240L v5 scores 6,547 against the Xeon Silver 4112's 6,536 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1240L v5. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240L v5 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4112.

Feature	Xeon E3-1240L v5	Xeon Silver 4112
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8.25 MB+3%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake-DT (2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	6,547	6,536

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.