Xeon E3-1245 v2 vs FX-9370
Xeon E3-1245 v2
FX-9370
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1245 v2 is positioned at rank 583 and the FX-9370 is on rank 61, so the FX-9370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1245 v2
Performance Per Dollar FX-9370
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1245 v2 | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($204) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1245 v2 | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+241%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($204) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1245 v2 and FX-9370
Xeon E3-1245 v2
The Xeon E3-1245 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,357 points. Launch price was $462.
FX-9370
The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1245 v2 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-9370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 versus 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 — a 21.2% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1245 v2 scores 6,357 against the FX-9370's 6,374 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-9370.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v2 | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,357 | 6,374 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 659 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,273 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v2 | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E3-1245 v2) / not specified (FX-9370). The Xeon E3-1245 v2 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4000), while the FX-9370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1245 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v2 | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics P4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1245 v2 launched at $273 MSRP, while the FX-9370 debuted at $42. At current prices ($204 vs $60), the FX-9370 is $144 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1245 v2 delivers 31.2 pts/$ vs 106.2 pts/$ for the FX-9370 — making the FX-9370 the 109.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v2 | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $273 | $42-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $204 | $60-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.2 | 106.2+240% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1245 v2 and FX-9370
