Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Xeon X5677

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Xeon X5677 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Xeon X5677: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5677 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,040 vs 5,054).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon X5677 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5677

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5677 better than Xeon E3-1265L v2?

Yes. Xeon X5677 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5677 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5677 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5677 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1265L v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon X5677 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1265L v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1265L v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Xeon X5677 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

The Xeon E3-1265L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $142.

Xeon X5677

The Xeon X5677 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,054 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E3-1265L v2 and Xeon X5677 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v2 versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X5677 — a 6.4% clock advantage for the Xeon X5677 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5677 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1265L v2 scores 5,040 against the Xeon X5677's 5,054 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X5677. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5677.

Feature	Xeon E3-1265L v2	Xeon X5677
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.73 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.46 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,040	5,054

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X5677 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1265L v2	Xeon X5677
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1265L v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5677). Primary use case: Xeon X5677 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5677 rivals Core i7-980X.