Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1265L v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1265L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5575R

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, while Xeon E3-1265L v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1265L v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1265L v2, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,040 vs 5,074).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5575R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5575R better than Xeon E3-1265L v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5575R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5575R is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5575R is the better buy right now. Core i5-5575R comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $265 MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1265L v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.7% better value on MSRP (19.1 vs 19.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5575R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1265L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5575R

The Core i5-5575R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,074 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1265L v2

The Xeon E3-1265L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $142.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5575R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1265L v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-5575R versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v2 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v2 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-5575R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5575R scores 5,074 against the Xeon E3-1265L v2's 5,040 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-5575R. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5575R vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v2.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1265L v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	5,074	5,040
Geekbench 6 Single	1,081	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5575R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1265L v2
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-5575R) / not specified (Xeon E3-1265L v2). The Core i5-5575R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5575R targets All-in-One Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-5575R rivals A10-7870K.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1265L v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	All-in-One Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-5575R was priced at $265, while the Xeon E3-1265L v2 came in at $265. On launch pricing ($265 vs $265), Xeon E3-1265L v2 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-5575R delivers 19.1 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v2 — making the Core i5-5575R the 0.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1265L v2
MSRP	$265	$265
Performance per Dollar	19.1	19.0
Release Date	2015	2012

Search Core i5-5575R on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.