
Core i5-5575R

Xeon X5677
Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5677 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5677 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5677: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-5575R
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, while Xeon X5677 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5677 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5677, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon X5677 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X5677
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,054 vs 5,074).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5575R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-5575R better than Xeon X5677?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5677 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5575R
The Core i5-5575R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,074 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5677
The Xeon X5677 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,054 points. Launch price was $350.
Processing Power
The Core i5-5575R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5677's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-5575R versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X5677 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Xeon X5677 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Core i5-5575R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5677 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5575R scores 5,074 against the Xeon X5677's 5,054 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-5575R. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5575R vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5677.
| Feature | Core i5-5575R | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.73 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.46 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 5,074 | 5,054 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,081 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-5575R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5677 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Core i5-5575R versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5677 — the Core i5-5575R supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-5575R) vs 3 (Xeon X5677). Chipset compatibility: HM87,QM87,Z97,H97 (Core i5-5575R) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5677).
| Feature | Core i5-5575R | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1866+40% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-5575R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Xeon X5677 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5575R targets All-in-One Desktop, Xeon X5677 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-5575R rivals A10-7870K; Xeon X5677 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i5-5575R | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | All-in-One Desktop | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












