Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5672

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5672 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5672: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5575R

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.1 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5672 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5672, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X5672

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,036 vs 5,074).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 19.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5575R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5575R better than Xeon X5672?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5672 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5575R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5575R is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5575R is the better buy right now. Core i5-5575R comes in $35 cheaper on MSRP at $265 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5672 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.1% better value on MSRP (19.1 vs 16.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5575R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon X5672 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5575R

The Core i5-5575R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,074 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5672

The Xeon X5672 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,036 points. Launch price was $115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5575R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5672's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-5575R versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5672 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5672 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-5575R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5672 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5575R scores 5,074 against the Xeon X5672's 5,036 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-5575R. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5575R vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5672.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon X5672
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,074	5,036
Geekbench 6 Single	1,081	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5575R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5672 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Core i5-5575R versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5672 — the Core i5-5575R supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-5575R) vs 3 (Xeon X5672). Chipset compatibility: HM87,QM87,Z97,H97 (Core i5-5575R) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5672).

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon X5672
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-5575R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Xeon X5672 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5575R targets All-in-One Desktop, Xeon X5672 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-5575R rivals A10-7870K; Xeon X5672 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon X5672
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	All-in-One Desktop	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-5575R was priced at $265, while the Xeon X5672 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($265 vs $300), Core i5-5575R was $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-5575R delivers 19.1 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5672 — making the Core i5-5575R the 13.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon X5672
MSRP	$265-12%	$300
Performance per Dollar	19.1+14%	16.8
Release Date	2015	2011

Search Core i5-5575R on Amazon

Search Xeon X5672 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.