Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1235

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1235 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1235: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5575R

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, while Xeon E3-1235 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1235 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,074 vs 5,112).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1235, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.1 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).

Xeon E3-1235

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 19.1 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-5575R can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1235 better than Core i5-5575R?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1235 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-5575R is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1235 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1235 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1235 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1235 comes in $25 cheaper on MSRP at $240 MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.2% better value on MSRP (21.3 vs 19.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5575R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-5575R vs Xeon E3-1235 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5575R

The Core i5-5575R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,074 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1235

The Xeon E3-1235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,112 points. Launch price was $287.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5575R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1235's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-5575R versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1235 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1235 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-5575R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1235 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5575R scores 5,074 against the Xeon E3-1235's 5,112 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E3-1235. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5575R vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1235.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1235
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	5,074	5,112
Geekbench 6 Single	1,081	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5575R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1235 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1235
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-5575R) / not specified (Xeon E3-1235). The Core i5-5575R includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics 6200), while the Xeon E3-1235 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5575R targets All-in-One Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-5575R rivals A10-7870K.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1235
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	All-in-One Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-5575R was priced at $265, while the Xeon E3-1235 came in at $240. On launch pricing ($265 vs $240), Xeon E3-1235 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-5575R delivers 19.1 pts/$ vs 21.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1235 — making the Xeon E3-1235 the 10.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Xeon E3-1235
MSRP	$265	$240-9%
Performance per Dollar	19.1	21.3+12%
Release Date	2015	2011

Search Core i5-5575R on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1235 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.