PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5575R vs Core i7-3630QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5575R vs Core i7-3630QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5575R

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.1 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3630QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,074 vs 5,136).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-3630QM

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 19.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3630QM better than Core i5-5575R?

Yes. Core i7-3630QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3630QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3630QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3630QM is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-3630QM comes in 42.6% more expensive on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-5575R only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 12.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5575R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-5575R vs Core i7-3630QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5575R

The Core i5-5575R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,074 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-3630QM

The Core i7-3630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,136 points. Launch price was $284.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-5575R packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3630QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-5575R versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-3630QM — a 3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3630QM (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-5575R uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3630QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5575R scores 5,074 against the Core i7-3630QM's 5,136 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3630QM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,081 vs 600, a 57.2% lead for the Core i5-5575R that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-5575R vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3630QM.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Core i7-3630QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	5,074	5,136+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,081+80%	600
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5575R uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3630QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Core i5-5575R versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3630QM — the Core i5-5575R supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM87,QM87,Z97,H97 (Core i5-5575R) and HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3630QM).

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Core i7-3630QM
Socket	BGA1364	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-5575R) vs VT-x (Core i7-3630QM). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Pro Graphics 6200 (Core i5-5575R) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3630QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-5575R targets All-in-One Desktop, Core i7-3630QM targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-5575R rivals A10-7870K; Core i7-3630QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Core i7-3630QM
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x
Target Use	All-in-One Desktop	Mainstream Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-5575R was priced at $265, while the Core i7-3630QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($265 vs $378), Core i5-5575R was $113 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-5575R delivers 19.1 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-3630QM — making the Core i5-5575R the 34% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-5575R	Core i7-3630QM
MSRP	$265-30%	$378
Performance per Dollar	19.1+40%	13.6
Release Date	2015	2012

Search Core i5-5575R on Amazon

Search Core i7-3630QM on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.