Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is positioned at rank #697 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1275 v2
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+187%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Xeon E3-1275 v2
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,644 points. Launch price was $808.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275 v2 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1275 v2 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1275 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1275 v2 scores 6,644 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+300% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,644 | 6,724+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32.77 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275 v2) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1605B). The Xeon E3-1275 v2 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4000), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275 v2 targets Server/Workstation.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server/Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 launched at $426 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B debuted at $150. At current prices ($426 vs $150), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is $276 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1275 v2 delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 96.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $150-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $426 | $150-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 44.8+187% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B
