
Xeon E3-1275 v2

Xeon E3-1280 v2
Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs Xeon E3-1280 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs Xeon E3-1280 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs Xeon E3-1280 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1275 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics P4000, while Xeon E3-1280 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Xeon E3-1280 v2.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $315 MSRP).
Xeon E3-1280 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($315 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($315 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 69W instead of 77W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,619 vs 6,644).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1275 v2 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1280 v2 better than Xeon E3-1275 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs Xeon E3-1280 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1275 v2
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,644 points. Launch price was $808.

Xeon E3-1280 v2
The Xeon E3-1280 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,619 points. Launch price was $645.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Xeon E3-1280 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 v2 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1275 v2 scores 6,644 against the Xeon E3-1280 v2's 6,619 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1275 v2. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,644 | 6,619 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32.77 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275 v2) / not specified (Xeon E3-1280 v2). The Xeon E3-1275 v2 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4000), while the Xeon E3-1280 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275 v2 targets Server/Workstation.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server/Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1275 v2 was priced at $426, while the Xeon E3-1280 v2 came in at $315. On launch pricing ($426 vs $315), Xeon E3-1280 v2 was $111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1275 v2 delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1280 v2 — making the Xeon E3-1280 v2 the 29.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $315-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 21.0+35% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















