Xeon E3-1275 v2 vs Xeon E3-1280 v2
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Xeon E3-1280 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is positioned at rank 697 and the Xeon E3-1280 v2 is on rank 612, so the Xeon E3-1280 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1275 v2
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1280 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+749%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($426) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Xeon E3-1280 v2
Xeon E3-1275 v2
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,644 points. Launch price was $808.
Xeon E3-1280 v2
The Xeon E3-1280 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,619 points. Launch price was $645.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Xeon E3-1280 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 v2 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1275 v2 scores 6,644 against the Xeon E3-1280 v2's 6,619 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1275 v2. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,644 | 6,619 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32.77 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275 v2) / not specified (Xeon E3-1280 v2). The Xeon E3-1275 v2 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4000), while the Xeon E3-1280 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275 v2 targets Server/Workstation.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server/Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1275 v2 launched at $426 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1280 v2 debuted at $315. At current prices ($426 vs $50), the Xeon E3-1280 v2 is $376 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1275 v2 delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 132.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1280 v2 — making the Xeon E3-1280 v2 the 157.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1275 v2 | Xeon E3-1280 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $315-26% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $426 | $50-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 132.4+749% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Xeon E3-1280 v2
