Ryzen Embedded V1605B
VS
Xeon E3-1275 v2

Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Xeon E3-1275 v2

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1275 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V1605B

#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
115%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
113%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
111%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
110%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
110%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
109%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
105%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
105%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
105%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
104%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
103%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
103%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
101%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
101%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
100%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
100%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
100%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
99%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
99%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
98%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
97%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
96%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
96%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
96%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
95%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
93%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
92%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1275 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13322%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2515%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2235%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1726%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
98%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
98%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
97%
#697
Xeon E3-1275 v2
MSRP: $426|Avg: $426
100%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#702
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#704
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
98%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded V1605B (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E3-1275 v2
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($426)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1275 v2 (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E3-1275 v2
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+187%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($426)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Xeon E3-1275 v2

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1275 v2

The Xeon E3-1275 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,644 points. Launch price was $808.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Xeon E3-1275 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275 v2 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1275 v2 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1275 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 6,724 against the Xeon E3-1275 v2's 6,644 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1275 v2.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E3-1275 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
6,724+1%
6,644
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1275 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E3-1275 v2
Socket
FP5
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32.77 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1605B) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275 v2). The Xeon E3-1275 v2 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4000), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275 v2 targets Server/Workstation.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E3-1275 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics P4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server/Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1275 v2 debuted at $426. At current prices ($150 vs $426), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is $276 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B delivers 44.8 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1275 v2 — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 96.8% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V1605BXeon E3-1275 v2
MSRP
$150-65%
$426
Avg Price (30d)
$150-65%
$426
Performance per Dollar
44.8+187%
15.6
Release Date
2018
2012