Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6380

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,687 vs 6,724).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($551 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
✅Delivers 269.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6380, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V1605B better than Opteron 6380?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V1605B comes in $401 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $551 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6380 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 269.4% better value on MSRP (44.8 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V1605B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6380

The Opteron 6380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,687 points. Launch price was $1,150.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6380 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6380 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6380 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 6380 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6380 scores 6,687 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6380 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+300%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+300%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB	512K (per core)+3100%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	6,687	6,724

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6380 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Socket	G34	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6380 was priced at $551, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($551 vs $150), Ryzen Embedded V1605B was $401 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6380 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 114.8% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP	$551	$150-73%
Performance per Dollar	12.1	44.8+270%
Release Date	2012	2018

Search Opteron 6380 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded V1605B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.