Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-2630L v2

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-2630L v2 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6380

16 / 16

6,687

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2630L v2

6 / 12

6,640

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-2630L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-2630L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6380

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($551 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($551 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌91.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 60W.

Xeon E5-2630L v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 60W instead of 115W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,640 vs 6,687).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($612 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6380 better than Xeon E5-2630L v2?

Yes. Opteron 6380 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6380 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6380 comes in $61 cheaper on MSRP at $551 MSRP versus $612 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.9% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2630L v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-2630L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6380

The Opteron 6380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,687 points. Launch price was $1,150.

Xeon E5-2630L v2

The Xeon E5-2630L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,640 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6380 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630L v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6380 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6380 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630L v2 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Opteron 6380 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Opteron 6380 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630L v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6380 scores 6,687 against the Xeon E5-2630L v2's 6,640 — a 0.7% lead for the Opteron 6380. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6380 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630L v2.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Xeon E5-2630L v2
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	16 MB+6300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	6,687	6,640

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6380 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2630L v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Xeon E5-2630L v2
Socket	G34	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6380 was priced at $551, while the Xeon E5-2630L v2 came in at $612. On launch pricing ($551 vs $612), Opteron 6380 was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6380 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630L v2 — making the Opteron 6380 the 11.2% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Xeon E5-2630L v2
MSRP	$551-10%	$612
Performance per Dollar	12.1+12%	10.8
Release Date	2012	2013

Search Opteron 6380 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2630L v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.