Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-4620

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-4620 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6380

16 / 16

6,687

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-4620

8 / 16

6,635

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-4620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-4620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6380

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,590 less on MSRP ($551 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Delivers 291.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 3.1 PassMark/$ ($551 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Draws 115W instead of 130W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Xeon E5-4620

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,635 vs 6,687).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6380 better than Xeon E5-4620?

Yes. Opteron 6380 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6380 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6380 comes in $1,590 cheaper on MSRP at $551 MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 291.6% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 3.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6380 vs Xeon E5-4620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6380

The Opteron 6380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,687 points. Launch price was $1,150.

Xeon E5-4620

The Xeon E5-4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,635 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6380 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6380 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6380 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 6380 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Opteron 6380 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6380 scores 6,687 against the Xeon E5-4620's 6,635 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6380. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6380 vs 16384 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Xeon E5-4620
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+14%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16384 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	16 MB+6300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,687	6,635

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6380 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Xeon E5-4620
Socket	G34	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6380 was priced at $551, while the Xeon E5-4620 came in at $2141. On launch pricing ($551 vs $2141), Opteron 6380 was $1590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6380 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 3.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4620 — making the Opteron 6380 the 118.6% better value option.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Xeon E5-4620
MSRP	$551-74%	$2141
Performance per Dollar	12.1+290%	3.1
Release Date	2012	2012

Search Opteron 6380 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.