Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded R2514

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded R2514: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6380

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,687 vs 6,731).
❌Launch MSRP is still $551 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6380, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2514 better than Opteron 6380?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6380 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Embedded R2514 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $551 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6380 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6380 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 16/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6380 vs Ryzen Embedded R2514 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6380

The Opteron 6380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,687 points. Launch price was $1,150.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6380 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6380 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Opteron 6380 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2514 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Opteron 6380 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6380 scores 6,687 against the Ryzen Embedded R2514's 6,731 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2514. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6380 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514.

Feature	Opteron 6380	Ryzen Embedded R2514
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+300%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB+3100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	12 nm-63%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	6,687	6,731

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6380 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.