
Atom x7835RE

Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7835RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $23 less on MSRP ($127 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.5 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 15W, a 3W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 6,795).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.8 vs 53.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 15W vs 12W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7835RE better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE
The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.


Ryzen Embedded V1605B
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 1.1% lead for the Atom x7835RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+200% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,795+1% | 6,724 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom x7835RE was priced at $127, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($127 vs $150), Atom x7835RE was $23 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x7835RE delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Atom x7835RE the 17.6% better value option.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $127-15% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+19% | 44.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














