Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded R2514

4 / 8

6,731

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 / 8

6,724

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 6,731).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2514 better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?

Yes. Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen Embedded R2514 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1605B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded R2514 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2514 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2514 scores 6,731 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2514. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2514	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+3%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+5%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	6,731	6,724