Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2448L

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2448L Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded R2514

4 / 8

6,731

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2448L

8 / 16

6,774

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2448L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2448L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2448L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,731 vs 6,774).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2448L, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-2448L

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2448L better than Ryzen Embedded R2514?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2448L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded R2514 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2448L is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2448L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2448L still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2448L comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2514 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Xeon E5-2448L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded R2514

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,731 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2448L

The Xeon E5-2448L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,774 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2448L offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2448L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2448L — a 55.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2514 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2448L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2514 scores 6,731 against the Xeon E5-2448L's 6,774 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2448L. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2448L.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2514	Xeon E5-2448L
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+76%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+17%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-63%	32 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	6,731	6,774

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R2514 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2448L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.