Xeon E3-1280 v2
VS
Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Xeon E3-1280 v2 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Intel

Xeon E3-1280 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd69 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E3-1280 v2 is positioned at rank #612 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1280 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9892%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1868%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1659%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1282%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
99%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
98%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
95%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
95%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
94%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
94%
#612
Xeon E3-1280 v2
MSRP: $315|Avg: $50
100%
#618
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
97%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
95%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
94%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V1605B

#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
115%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
113%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
111%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
110%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
110%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
109%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
105%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
105%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
105%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
104%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
103%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
103%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
101%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
101%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
100%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
100%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
100%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
99%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
99%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
98%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
97%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
96%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
96%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
96%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
95%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
93%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
92%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded V1605B (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E3-1280 v2Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1280 v2 (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E3-1280 v2Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+195%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Intel

Xeon E3-1280 v2

The Xeon E3-1280 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,619 points. Launch price was $645.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E3-1280 v2 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 v2 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 v2 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1280 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1280 v2 scores 6,619 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1280 v2 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

FeatureXeon E3-1280 v2Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+11%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+300%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
6,619
6,724+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1280 v2 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1280 v2Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Socket
LGA1155
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E3-1280 v2 launched at $315 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B debuted at $150. At current prices ($50 vs $150), the Xeon E3-1280 v2 is $100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1280 v2 delivers 132.4 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Xeon E3-1280 v2 the 98.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon E3-1280 v2Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP
$315
$150-52%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-67%
$150
Performance per Dollar
132.4+196%
44.8
Release Date
2012
2018