
Xeon E3-1505M v5

Xeon E5-1620 v3
Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-1620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1505M v5
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($115 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($115 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v3 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E5-1620 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,959 vs 6,995).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1505M v5 better than Xeon E5-1620 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-1620 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1505M v5
The Xeon E3-1505M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,995 points. Launch price was $434.

Xeon E5-1620 v3
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Xeon E5-1620 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v5 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v5 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E3-1505M v5 uses the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1505M v5 scores 6,995 against the Xeon E5-1620 v3's 6,959 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1505M v5. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1505M v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-H (2015−2016) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,995 | 6,959 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1505M v5 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1505M v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1505M v5) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1505M v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1505M v5 was priced at $115, while the Xeon E5-1620 v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($115 vs $294), Xeon E3-1505M v5 was $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1505M v5 delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v3 — making the Xeon E3-1505M v5 the 87.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1505M v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $115-61% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.8+157% | 23.7 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















