Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-4607 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-4607 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-4607 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1505M v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4607 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 60.8 vs 166.3 PassMark/$ ($115 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4607 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $73 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 173.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 166.3 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $115 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,986 vs 6,995).
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1505M v5 better than Xeon E5-4607 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4607 v2 is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1505M v5 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4607 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1505M v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1505M v5 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4607 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E3-1505M v5 comes in 173.8% more expensive on MSRP at $115 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4607 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4607 v2 is also 173.5% better value on MSRP (166.3 vs 60.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1505M v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Xeon E5-4607 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1505M v5

The Xeon E3-1505M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,995 points. Launch price was $434.

Xeon E5-4607 v2

The Xeon E5-4607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1505M v5 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4607 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4607 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v5 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 v2 — a 34.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v5 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E3-1505M v5 is built on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1505M v5 scores 6,995 against the Xeon E5-4607 v2's 6,986 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1505M v5. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4607 v2.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v5	Xeon E5-4607 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+8%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache+88%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake-H (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	6,995	6,986

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1505M v5 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v5	Xeon E5-4607 v2
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E3-1505M v5 was priced at $115, while the Xeon E5-4607 v2 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($115 vs $42), Xeon E5-4607 v2 was $73 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1505M v5 delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 166.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4607 v2 — making the Xeon E5-4607 v2 the 92.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v5	Xeon E5-4607 v2
MSRP	$115	$42-63%
Performance per Dollar	60.8	166.3+174%
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Xeon E3-1505M v5 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4607 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.