
Xeon E3-1535M v5 vs Core i7-7820EQ

Xeon E3-1535M v5

Core i7-7820EQ
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1535M v5 is positioned at rank 396 and the Core i7-7820EQ is on rank 889, so the Xeon E3-1535M v5 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1535M v5
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7820EQ
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1535M v5 | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-H (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1535M v5 | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1535M v5 and Core i7-7820EQ

Xeon E3-1535M v5
The Xeon E3-1535M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,480 points. Launch price was $623.

Core i7-7820EQ
The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1535M v5 and Core i7-7820EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1535M v5 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1535M v5. The Xeon E3-1535M v5 uses the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7820EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1535M v5 scores 7,480 against the Core i7-7820EQ's 7,470 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1535M v5. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1535M v5 vs 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1535M v5 | Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+23% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-H (2015−2016) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,480 | 7,470 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















