Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4
Xeon E3-1565L v5
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1565L v5 is positioned at rank 993 and the Xeon E5-1620 v4 is on rank 959, so the Xeon E5-1620 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1565L v5
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1565L v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($120) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($160) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-H (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1565L v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($120) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($160) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Xeon E5-1620 v4
Xeon E3-1565L v5
The Xeon E3-1565L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L,LPDDR3 1600 MHz, DDR4 2133 MHz at 1.2V. Passmark benchmark score: 7,325 points. Launch price was $417.
Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,338 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Xeon E5-1620 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1565L v5 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v4 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 v4 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E3-1565L v5 uses the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1565L v5 scores 7,325 against the Xeon E5-1620 v4's 7,338 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-1620 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v4.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1565L v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-H (2015−2016) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 7,325 | 7,338 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1565L v5 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1565L v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1565L v5 launched at $1552 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1620 v4 debuted at $1166. At current prices ($120 vs $160), the Xeon E3-1565L v5 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1565L v5 delivers 61.0 pts/$ vs 45.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v4 — making the Xeon E3-1565L v5 the 28.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1565L v5 | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1552 | $1166-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-25% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.0+33% | 45.9 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1565L v5 and Xeon E5-1620 v4
