Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs Xeon Phi 7210

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs Xeon Phi 7210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs Xeon Phi 7210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1565L v5

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $329 less on MSRP ($1,552 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Delivers 21.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 215W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Phi 7210 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Phi 7210

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,306 vs 7,325).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($1,881 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
❌514.3% higher power demand at 215W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1565L v5 better than Xeon Phi 7210?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Phi 7210 is ahead with a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1565L v5 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1565L v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1565L v5 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1565L v5 comes in $329 cheaper on MSRP at $1,552 MSRP versus $1,881 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Phi 7210 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.5% better value on MSRP (4.7 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Phi 7210 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs Xeon Phi 7210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1565L v5

The Xeon E3-1565L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L,LPDDR3 1600 MHz, DDR4 2133 MHz at 1.2V. Passmark benchmark score: 7,325 points. Launch price was $417.

Xeon Phi 7210

The Xeon Phi 7210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 64 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 215 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,306 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1565L v5 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7210 offers 64 cores / 256 threads — the Xeon Phi 7210 has 60 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1565L v5 versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7210 — a 80% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1565L v5 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Xeon E3-1565L v5 uses the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1565L v5 scores 7,325 against the Xeon Phi 7210's 7,306 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1565L v5. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1565L v5 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7210.

Feature	Xeon E3-1565L v5	Xeon Phi 7210
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	64 / 256+1500%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+133%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+92%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake-H (2015−2016)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	7,325	7,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1565L v5 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1565L v5	Xeon Phi 7210
Socket	BGA1440	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E3-1565L v5 was priced at $1552, while the Xeon Phi 7210 came in at $1881. On launch pricing ($1552 vs $1881), Xeon E3-1565L v5 was $329 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1565L v5 delivers 4.7 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Phi 7210 — making the Xeon E3-1565L v5 the 19.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E3-1565L v5	Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP	$1552-17%	$1881
Performance per Dollar	4.7+21%	3.9
Release Date	2016	2016

Search Xeon E3-1565L v5 on Amazon

Search Xeon Phi 7210 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.