Xeon E3110 vs Core i5-13400F
Xeon E3110
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E3110 is positioned at rank #965 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3110
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3110 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($158) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3110 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1597%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($158) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3110 and Core i5-13400F
Xeon E3110
The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3110 scores 1,295 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 180.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Xeon E3110 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | — | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 1,295 | 25,029+1833% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3110 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3110 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3110) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Xeon E3110 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3110 launched at $214 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($158 vs $180), the Xeon E3110 is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3110 delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 177.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3110 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $214 | $196-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $158-12% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 139.1+1596% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3110 and Core i5-13400F
