Xeon E5-1410 v2
VS
Core i7-3820

Xeon E5-1410 v2 vs Core i7-3820

Intel

Xeon E5-1410 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-3820

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is positioned at rank 506 and the Core i7-3820 is on rank 791, so the Xeon E5-1410 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1410 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7272%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1373%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1220%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
942%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
99%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
99%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
99%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
99%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
98%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
98%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
97%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
97%
#506
Xeon E5-1410 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#513
Xeon E3-1220 v5
MSRP: $203|Avg: $100
98%
#515
Xeon X5690
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15409%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14560%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10571%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3185%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2523%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2207%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1264%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1247%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1136%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1136%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1123%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1093%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1077%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1073%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1063%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
97%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
100%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
100%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
99%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
98%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
97%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
97%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
97%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
96%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
96%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-1410 v2Core i7-3820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3820 ($30), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($30 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-1410 v2Core i7-3820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1410 v2 and Core i7-3820

Intel

Xeon E5-1410 v2

The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 5,715 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i7-3820

The Core i7-3820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Fevereiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,787 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1410 v2 and Core i7-3820 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 v2 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3820 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-3820 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3820 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1410 v2 scores 5,715 against the Core i7-3820's 5,787 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-3820. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 v2 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Core i7-3820.

FeatureXeon E5-1410 v2Core i7-3820
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,715
5,787+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3820 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1410 v2Core i7-3820
Socket
LGA1356
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1410 v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3820). Primary use case: Core i7-3820 targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3820 rivals FX-8350.

FeatureXeon E5-1410 v2Core i7-3820
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop