Xeon E5-1428L vs Xeon E5-2620 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1428L vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1428L vs Xeon E5-2620 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1428L

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 60W instead of 80W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $480 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2620 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,251 vs 6,255).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1428L better than Xeon E5-2620 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2620 v2 is ahead with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1428L pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1428L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1428L is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-1428L comes in at an unclear MSRP at $480 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2620 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2620 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-1428L vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1428L

The Xeon E5-1428L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,255 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

The Xeon E5-2620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,251 points. Launch price was $417.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1428L and Xeon E5-2620 v2 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1428L versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v2 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 v2 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-1428L uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1428L scores 6,255 against the Xeon E5-2620 v2's 6,251 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1428L. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1428L vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-1428L	Xeon E5-2620 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.1 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	15360 kB (total)	15 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	6,255	6,251

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1428L uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.