Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-1428L

Intel

Xeon D-1622

4 Cores8 Thrd40 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1428L

6 Cores12 Thrd60 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-1428L Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-1428L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-1428L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1622

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $285 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $480 MSRP).
  • Delivers 144.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $480 MSRP).
  • Draws 40W instead of 60W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1428L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,205 vs 6,255).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-1428L

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($480 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 60W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1428L better than Xeon D-1622?
Yes. Xeon E5-1428L is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1428L is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1428L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1428L is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-1428L comes in 146.2% more expensive on MSRP at $480 MSRP versus $195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon D-1622 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.3% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1622 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-1428L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1622

The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

Intel

Xeon E5-1428L

The Xeon E5-1428L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,255 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1622 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1428L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-1428L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1428L — a 56% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1622 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon D-1622 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1428L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1622 scores 6,205 against the Xeon E5-1428L's 6,255 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-1428L. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1428L.

FeatureXeon D-1622Xeon E5-1428L
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+78%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+44%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB
15360 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
6,205
6,255
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1622 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1428L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1622Xeon E5-1428L
Socket
FCBGA1667
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon D-1622 was priced at $195, while the Xeon E5-1428L came in at $480. On launch pricing ($195 vs $480), Xeon D-1622 was $285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1622 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1428L — making the Xeon D-1622 the 83.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon D-1622Xeon E5-1428L
MSRP
$195-59%
$480
Performance per Dollar
31.8+145%
13.0
Release Date
2019
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.