Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon D-1622

Intel

Core i7-6700TE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon D-1622

4 Cores8 Thrd40 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon D-1622 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon D-1622 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon D-1622: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700TE

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 40W, a 5W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon D-1622 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,203 vs 6,205).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).

Xeon D-1622

2019

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $108 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • Delivers 55.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6700TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1622 better than Core i7-6700TE?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1622 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1622 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon D-1622 is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1622 comes in $108 cheaper on MSRP at $195 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-6700TE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 55.4% better value on MSRP (31.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1622 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon D-1622 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6700TE

The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Xeon D-1622

The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6700TE and Xeon D-1622 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1622 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the Xeon D-1622's 6,205 — a 0% lead for the Xeon D-1622. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700TE vs 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon D-1622
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+6%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+25500%
1 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
6,203
6,205
Geekbench 6 Single
914
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1622 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon D-1622
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE) / not specified (Xeon D-1622). The Core i7-6700TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon D-1622 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon D-1622
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700TE was priced at $303, while the Xeon D-1622 came in at $195. On launch pricing ($303 vs $195), Xeon D-1622 was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700TE delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 31.8 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1622 — making the Xeon D-1622 the 43.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon D-1622
MSRP
$303
$195-36%
Performance per Dollar
20.5
31.8+55%
Release Date
2015
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.