Core i7-6700TE
VS
Xeon E5-2658

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E5-2658

Intel

Core i7-6700TE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2658

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-6700TE is positioned at rank 788 and the Xeon E5-2658 is on rank 699, so the Xeon E5-2658 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15228%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14389%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10447%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3147%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2493%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2181%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1249%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1233%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1123%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1122%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1110%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1080%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1065%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1061%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1051%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
96%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
100%
#790
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
100%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
99%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
99%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
97%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
96%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
96%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
96%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
96%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2658

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13339%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2519%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2238%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1729%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
98%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
97%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($400) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2658 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-6700TEXeon E5-2658
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($175)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6700TE ($175), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($225 less, 56% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-6700TEXeon E5-2658
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+128%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($175)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700TE and Xeon E5-2658

Intel

Core i7-6700TE

The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Xeon E5-2658

The Xeon E5-2658 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,232 points. Launch price was $1,462.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700TE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the Xeon E5-2658's 6,232 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2658. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700TE vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon E5-2658
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+42%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
6,203
6,232
Geekbench 6 Single
914
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon E5-2658
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2658). The Core i7-6700TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E5-2658 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon E5-2658
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-6700TE launched at $303 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2658 debuted at $400. At current prices ($175 vs $400), the Core i7-6700TE is $225 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700TE delivers 35.4 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2658 — making the Core i7-6700TE the 77.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700TEXeon E5-2658
MSRP
$303-24%
$400
Avg Price (30d)
$175-56%
$400
Performance per Dollar
35.4+127%
15.6
Release Date
2015
2012