Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E5-2620 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E5-2620 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon E5-2620 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,203 vs 6,251).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2620 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v2 better than Core i7-6700TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2620 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2620 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v2 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2620 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-6700TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6700TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700TE

The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

The Xeon E5-2620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,251 points. Launch price was $417.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700TE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v2 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the Xeon E5-2620 v2's 6,251 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700TE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v2.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon E5-2620 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	6,203	6,251
Geekbench 6 Single	914	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon E5-2620 v2
Socket	LGA1151	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2620 v2). The Core i7-6700TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.