
Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

Core i7-6700TE

Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-6700TE is positioned at rank 788 and the Xeon E3-1265L v3 is on rank 610, so the Xeon E3-1265L v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700TE
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-6700TE | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($175) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-6700TE | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+128%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($175) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700TE and Xeon E3-1265L v3

Core i7-6700TE
The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E3-1265L v3
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-6700TE and Xeon E3-1265L v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the Xeon E3-1265L v3's 6,187 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-6700TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 914 vs 996, a 8.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,244 vs 3,458 (6.4% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700TE vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v3.
| Feature | Core i7-6700TE | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 6,203 | 6,187 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 914 | 996+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,244 | 3,458+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-6700TE versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — the Core i7-6700TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-6700TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 100-series (Core i7-6700TE) and C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3).
| Feature | Core i7-6700TE | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i7-6700TE) and HD Graphics P4600 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i7-6700TE | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | HD Graphics P4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-6700TE launched at $303 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 debuted at $294. At current prices ($175 vs $398), the Core i7-6700TE is $223 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700TE delivers 35.4 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — making the Core i7-6700TE the 78.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700TE | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303 | $294-3% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $175-56% | $398 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4+128% | 15.5 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














