PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E3-1265L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (914 vs 996).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,244 vs 3,458).
❌
3.1% HIGHER MSRP
$303 MSRPvs$294 MSRP

Xeon E3-1265L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅+9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1265L v3 better than Core i7-6700TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1265L v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1265L v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1265L v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1265L v3 comes in $9 cheaper on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.8% better value on MSRP (21.0 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6700TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700TE

The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E3-1265L v3

The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6700TE and Xeon E3-1265L v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the Xeon E3-1265L v3's 6,187 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-6700TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 914 vs 996, a 8.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,244 vs 3,458 (6.4% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700TE vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v3.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,203	6,187
Geekbench 6 Single	914	996+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,244	3,458+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-6700TE versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — the Core i7-6700TE supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-6700TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 100-series (Core i7-6700TE) and C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3).

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i7-6700TE) and HD Graphics P4600 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700TE was priced at $303, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($303 vs $294), Xeon E3-1265L v3 was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700TE delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — making the Xeon E3-1265L v3 the 2.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon E3-1265L v3
MSRP	$303	$294-3%
Performance per Dollar	20.5	21.0+2%
Release Date	2015	2013

Search Core i7-6700TE on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.