Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-4617

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-4617 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-4617: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1622

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 40W instead of 130W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,205 vs 6,298).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.8 vs 70.0 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $90 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4617

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Costs $105 less on MSRP ($90 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 119.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 70.0 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($90 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1622 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌225% higher power demand at 130W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1622 better than Xeon E5-4617?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon D-1622 is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4617 pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4617 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4617 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1622 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4617 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-1622 comes in 116.7% more expensive on MSRP at $195 MSRP versus $90 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4617 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4617 is also 119.9% better value on MSRP (70.0 vs 31.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1622 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E5-4617 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1622

The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

Xeon E5-4617

The Xeon E5-4617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,298 points. Launch price was $90.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1622 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4617 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon E5-4617 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-4617 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4617 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon D-1622 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4617 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1622 scores 6,205 against the Xeon E5-4617's 6,298 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4617. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4617.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E5-4617
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	6 MB	15360 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,205	6,298+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1622 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4617 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E5-4617
Socket	FCBGA1667	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon D-1622 was priced at $195, while the Xeon E5-4617 came in at $90. On launch pricing ($195 vs $90), Xeon E5-4617 was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1622 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 70.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4617 — making the Xeon E5-4617 the 75% better value option.

Feature	Xeon D-1622	Xeon E5-4617
MSRP	$195	$90-54%
Performance per Dollar	31.8	70.0+120%
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Xeon D-1622 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4617 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.