
Xeon D-1622

Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1230 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1230 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1230 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon D-1622
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.8 vs 28.8 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 69W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1230 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,191 vs 6,205).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.8 vs 31.8 PassMark/$ ($215 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
- ❌72.5% higher power demand at 69W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-1622 better than Xeon E3-1230 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1622 vs Xeon E3-1230 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1622
The Xeon D-1622 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,205 points. Launch price was $170.

Xeon E3-1230 v2
The Xeon E3-1230 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,191 points. Launch price was $360.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon D-1622 and Xeon E3-1230 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1622 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230 v2 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1230 v2 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon D-1622 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1622 scores 6,205 against the Xeon E3-1230 v2's 6,191 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon D-1622. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Xeon D-1622 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1230 v2.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | Xeon E3-1230 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 6,205 | 6,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 821 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,223 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon D-1622 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1230 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | Xeon E3-1230 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1667 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1622) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1230 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E3-1230 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | Xeon E3-1230 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon D-1622 was priced at $195, while the Xeon E3-1230 v2 came in at $215. On launch pricing ($195 vs $215), Xeon D-1622 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1622 delivers 31.8 pts/$ vs 28.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1230 v2 — making the Xeon D-1622 the 10% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon D-1622 | Xeon E3-1230 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $195-9% | $215 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.8+10% | 28.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













