Xeon E5-1603
VS
Core i7-2657M

Xeon E5-1603 vs Core i7-2657M

Intel

Xeon E5-1603

4 Cores4 Thrd130 WW2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1603 is positioned at rank 655 and the Core i7-2657M is on rank 268, so the Core i7-2657M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
11937%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2254%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2002%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1547%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
100%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
98%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
98%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
97%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
97%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
97%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
97%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
97%
#655
Xeon E5-1603
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
97%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-1603Core i7-2657M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2657M ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-1603Core i7-2657M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1603 and Core i7-2657M

Intel

Xeon E5-1603

The Xeon E5-1603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 3,482 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1603 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2657M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-1603 has 2 more cores. The Core i7-2657M is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1603 scores 3,482 against the Core i7-2657M's 3,491 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-2657M. L3 cache: 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1603 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M.

FeatureXeon E5-1603Core i7-2657M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+75%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
10 MB+150%
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,482
3,491
Geekbench 6 Single
535
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1603 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2657M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1603Core i7-2657M
Socket
LGA2011
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1603) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M). The Core i7-2657M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon E5-1603 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureXeon E5-1603Core i7-2657M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook