Xeon E5-1607 v2 vs Core i5-2500
Xeon E5-1607 v2
Core i5-2500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is positioned at rank 676 and the Core i5-2500 is on rank 922, so the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607 v2
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($68) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($69) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($68) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($69) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1607 v2 and Core i5-2500
Xeon E5-1607 v2
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i5-2500
The Core i5-2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,102 points. Launch price was $85.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-1607 v2 and Core i5-2500 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-2500 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1607 v2 scores 4,141 against the Core i5-2500's 4,102 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+67% | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,141 | 4,102 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,642 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 590 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,690 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2500 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500). The Core i5-2500 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Core i5-2500 debuted at $294. At current prices ($68 vs $69), the Xeon E5-1607 v2 is $1 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1607 v2 delivers 60.9 pts/$ vs 59.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500 — making the Xeon E5-1607 v2 the 2.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-15% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $68-1% | $69 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.9+3% | 59.4 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-1607 v2 and Core i5-2500
