Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs Core i7-3610QM

Xeon E5-1607 v4

4 Cores4 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2016

Core i7-3610QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Xeon E5-1607 v4

4 / 4

5,197

+1.3%

5,132

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1607 v4 is positioned at rank 538 and the Core i7-3610QM is on rank 1008, so the Xeon E5-1607 v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607 v4

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

7996%

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

1510%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

1341%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

1036%

#329

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182

100%

#331

EPYC 7402

MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285

99%

#332

Xeon W-2235

MSRP: $555|Avg: $350

99%

#333

Xeon Gold 5317

MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100

97%

#538

Xeon E5-1607 v4

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#543

Xeon W3670

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

99%

#547

Xeon E3-1240 v2

MSRP: $250|Avg: $150

98%

#548

Xeon E3-1220 v3

MSRP: $203|Avg: $89

98%

#551

Xeon W-2102

MSRP: $202|Avg: $286

97%

#553

Xeon E3-1265L v2

MSRP: $265|Avg: N/A

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QM

#996

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

2161%

#997

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

2129%

#998

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1954%

#999

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1946%

#1000

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1928%

#1002

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1862%

#1003

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1785%

#1004

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1782%

#1005

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1734%

#1008

Core i7-3610QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

100%

#1009

Pentium A1020

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

100%

#1010

Core i3-1115GRE

MSRP: $338|Avg: $480

100%

#1011

Core i7-4702MQ

MSRP: $383|Avg: $50

100%

#1012

Pentium N4200

MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89

99%

#1013

Pentium J2900

MSRP: $94|Avg: $20

98%

#1014

Celeron T1700

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

97%

#1015

Celeron T3500

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

97%

#1016

A12-9720P

MSRP: $200|Avg: $25

97%

#1017

Core i5-4300M

MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A

96%

#1018

Celeron 1005M

MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A

96%

#1019

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

95%

#1020

Athlon Neo MV-40

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

94%

#1021

Core i7-4860EQ

MSRP: $434|Avg: $80

93%

#1022

Pentium SU2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

93%

#1023

A4-1250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1607 v4 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Xeon E5-1607 v4	Core i7-3610QM
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3610QM ($378), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($378 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Xeon E5-1607 v4	Core i7-3610QM
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon E5-1607 v4 Benchmark Check

Core i7-3610QM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core i7-3610QM

Xeon E5-1607 v4

The Xeon E5-1607 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,197 points. Launch price was $800.

Core i7-3610QM

The Core i7-3610QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,132 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1607 v4 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3610QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v4 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QM — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-3610QM (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3610QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1607 v4 scores 5,197 against the Core i7-3610QM's 5,132 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v4. L3 cache: 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3610QM.

Feature	Xeon E5-1607 v4	Core i7-3610QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+35%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB+67%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	5,197+1%	5,132
Geekbench 6 Single	—	800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3610QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-1607 v4	Core i7-3610QM
Socket	LGA2011-3	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v4) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QM). The Core i7-3610QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5-1607 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QM targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3610QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.