Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs Xeon E5-2643

Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v4

4 Cores4 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2643

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs Xeon E5-2643 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs Xeon E5-2643 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs Xeon E5-2643: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1607 v4

2016

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (5,197 vs 5,228).

    Xeon E5-2643

    2012

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Draws 130W instead of 140W, a 10W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $1,552 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1607 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon E5-2643 better than Xeon E5-1607 v4?
    Yes. Xeon E5-2643 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2643 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2643 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon E5-2643 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2643 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,552 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon E5-1607 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs Xeon E5-2643 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-1607 v4

    The Xeon E5-1607 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,197 points. Launch price was $800.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-2643

    The Xeon E5-2643 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,228 points. Launch price was $218.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon E5-1607 v4 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2643's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2643 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1607 v4 scores 5,197 against the Xeon E5-2643's 5,228 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2643. L3 cache: 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607 v4 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2643.

    FeatureXeon E5-1607 v4Xeon E5-2643
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    4 / 8
    Boost Clock
    3.1 GHz
    3.5 GHz+13%
    Base Clock
    3.1 GHz
    3.3 GHz+6%
    L3 Cache
    10 MB
    10240 kB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB+300%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    14 nm-56%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Broadwell (2015−2019)
    Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
    PassMark
    5,197
    5,228
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureXeon E5-1607 v4Xeon E5-2643
    Socket
    LGA2011-3
    LGA2011
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 5.0+67%