Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-1607 v4

Intel

Core i5-4670S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v4

4 Cores4 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-1607 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-1607 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-1607 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670S

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E5-1607 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1607 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1607 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,197 vs 5,252).
  • 115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670S better than Xeon E5-1607 v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4670S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4670S is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670S is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-4670S is the better buy right now. Core i5-4670S comes in at an unclear MSRP at $213 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-1607 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-1607 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-4670S

The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v4

The Xeon E5-1607 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,197 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4670S and Xeon E5-1607 v4 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v4 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-4670S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670S scores 5,252 against the Xeon E5-1607 v4's 5,197 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-4670S. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607 v4.

FeatureCore i5-4670SXeon E5-1607 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+23%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
10 MB+67%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
5,252+1%
5,197
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4670SXeon E5-1607 v4
Socket
LGA1150
LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S) / not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v4). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-1607 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.

FeatureCore i5-4670SXeon E5-1607 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop Low Power