Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E3-1230L v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E3-1230L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670S

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E3-1230L v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1230L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,252 vs 5,297).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1230L v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1230L v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1230L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1230L v3 better than Core i5-4670S?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1230L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4670S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1230L v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1230L v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1230L v3 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1230L v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4670S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1230L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670S

The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1230L v3

The Xeon E3-1230L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,297 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1230L v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230L v3 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4670S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670S scores 5,252 against the Xeon E3-1230L v3's 5,297 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3-1230L v3. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1230L v3.

Feature	Core i5-4670S	Xeon E3-1230L v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,252	5,297

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1150 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i5-4670S	Xeon E3-1230L v3
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S) / not specified (Xeon E3-1230L v3). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.