
Core i5-4670S

Xeon E5-2430L
Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-2430L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-2430L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-2430L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4670S
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $338 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.7 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $551 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E5-2430L needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2430L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,252 vs 5,300).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2430L, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon E5-2430L
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($551 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2430L better than Core i5-4670S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-2430L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670S
The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2430L
The Xeon E5-2430L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,300 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2430L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2430L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430L — a 41.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4670S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2430L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670S scores 5,252 against the Xeon E5-2430L's 5,300 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2430L. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2430L.
| Feature | Core i5-4670S | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+52% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+55% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,252 | 5,300 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2430L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4670S | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S) / not specified (Xeon E5-2430L). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2430L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.
| Feature | Core i5-4670S | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-4670S was priced at $213, while the Xeon E5-2430L came in at $551. On launch pricing ($213 vs $551), Core i5-4670S was $338 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670S delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2430L — making the Core i5-4670S the 87.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4670S | Xeon E5-2430L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $213-61% | $551 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.7+157% | 9.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














