Core i5-4670S
VS
Xeon E5-2648L

Core i5-4670S vs Xeon E5-2648L

Intel

Core i5-4670S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2648L

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4670S is positioned at rank 693 and the Xeon E5-2648L is on rank 533, so the Xeon E5-2648L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12641%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11944%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8672%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2613%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2069%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1810%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1037%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1023%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
932%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
932%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
921%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
896%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
884%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
880%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
872%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
100%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
100%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
100%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
100%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
98%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
97%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2648L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7899%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1491%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1325%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1024%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
100%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
99%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
99%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
98%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
97%
#533
Xeon E5-2648L
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#535
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
100%
#543
Xeon W3670
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#547
Xeon E3-1240 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
97%
#548
Xeon E3-1220 v3
MSRP: $203|Avg: $89
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2648L is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-4670SXeon E5-2648L
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4670S ($30), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($30 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-4670SXeon E5-2648L
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4670S and Xeon E5-2648L

Intel

Core i5-4670S

The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2648L

The Xeon E5-2648L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,262 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L — a 49.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4670S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2648L uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670S scores 5,252 against the Xeon E5-2648L's 5,262 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670S vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2648L.

FeatureCore i5-4670SXeon E5-2648L
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+65%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+72%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
20480 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
5,252
5,262
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2648L uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4670SXeon E5-2648L
Socket
LGA1150
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670S) / not specified (Xeon E5-2648L). The Core i5-4670S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2648L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.

FeatureCore i5-4670SXeon E5-2648L
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop Low Power